Two years after the surgery he finds resurfacing patients do have slightly more range of motion in their movements than his older patients who ve undergone total hip replacement.
Hip resurfacing compared to total hip replacement.
Depending on the amount of damage caused by arthritis a surgeon may recommend hip resurfacing or total hip replacement surgery to a patient.
Both surgeries treat the ball and the socket in the hip joint.
With improving hip resurfacing results a number of studies have compared the outcomes of standard primary total hip arthroplasty to resurfacing hip arthroplasty 1 14 20.
These studies have reported similar to superior post operative activity levels functional scores and survival rates in the resurfacing patients.
Arthritis of the hip in most cases is primarily a wearing away of the cartilage on the ball and socket of the hip joint leading to painful rubbing of bone on bone.
The ball is at the top of your thigh bone and the socket is in the side of your pelvic bone.
The difference between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement both hip surgeries are full joint replacement procedures says dr.
In a conventional hip replacement the pain from a diseased hip is relieved by replacing the ball and the socket.
If hip resurfacing is an option the surgeon will simply reshape the damaged surface of the femoral ball and.
It can make people return to their normal and active lifestyle.
Rather than replacing the entire hip joint as in a total hip replacement hip resurfacing involves shaving and capping only a few millimeters of the joint surface.
It has many benefits to offer as compared to total hip replacement.
However only a surgeon is able to tell whether a hip resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty is what you need.
Whether the newer forms of hip resurfacing will be successful long term is unknown.
Hip resurfacing is an alternative technology to total hip replacement that is aimed at treating painful conditions of the hip in younger active patients.
How does it compare to conventional hip replacement.
The risk of dislocation is much lower for hip resurfacing because the ball portion of the joint can remain larger.
The hip joint is a simple ball and socket shape.
However the early failures of hip resurfacing appear to be greater than for total hip replacement 2 2 vs 1 9 with the majority of the early failures due to femoral neck fracture.
Total hip replacement is like removing the ball and replacing it with a metal ball whereas resurfacing is capping the ball.
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty hra has emerged as an alternative to total hip arthroplasty tha in young active patients 1 2.
Hip resurfacing is considered the best for younger men who live an active lifestyle and have average height.
The best candidates for hip resurfacing are men under 60 who have strong healthy bone.